The guiding principle of treatment for intermittent claudication is that around 1% to 2% of patients with claudication ever progress to limb-threatening ischemia. Under this pretense, initial aggressive treatment strategies are discouraged. Most patients with intermittent claudication can be treated with medical interventions.
Medical management includes smoking cessation, antiplatelet agents, statin therapy, blood pressure modification, glucose control, structured walking programs, and cilostazol. Structured walking programs improve pain-free walking distance better than pharmacologic therapy alone. It is important to note that continued smoking with walking therapy restricts improvement in these patients. A three-month trial of smoking cessation, ambulation, and cilostazol is typically prescribed. Headaches are the most common side-effect of cilostazol and may warrant a dose reduction. Patients undergoing medical management should have frequent follow-ups to assess their symptom relief. Most patients are instructed to walk at least three ten-minute walks daily.
Any patient with intermittent claudication or peripheral arterial disease should also be evaluated for coexisting cardiac disease. If symptoms are worsening despite medical treatment, or if symptoms are considered disabling or lifestyle-limiting, intervention may be considered. Other considerations for invasive procedures may include atherosclerotic lesion characteristics and patient prognosis. Intervention may initially involve minimally-invasive endovascular angioplasty, stenting, or atherectomy.
Percutaneous techniques are typically performed via the femoral artery with the insertion of a sheath with wires and catheters to the diseased region. Lesions that are multifocal, long, or heavily calcified may not be amenable to endovascular repair. In these cases, intervention may ultimately require an endarterectomy or a conduit bypass. The conduit can either be an autogenous vein or prosthetic material. In 2007 the Society for Vascular Surgery developed the Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC II) guidelines that can aid physicians in determining whether endovascular or open surgery should be pursued in a patient. The classification identifies lesions as A, B, C, or D based on location, number, length, and severity of the stenosis. The complications of any surgical intervention should also be considered - these include vessel or graft conduit thrombosis, in-stent stenosis or fracture, and infection.
Deterrence and Patient Education
The patient should be educated to discontinue smoking, maintain a healthy weight, exercise regularly, and follow a healthy diet.
Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes
The treatment of intermittent claudication is surrounded by controversy. The past belief that exercise therapy alone could improve the disease and symptoms is now known to have many shortcomings. The older studies were never standardized, did not use adequate measures of outcomes, and were heterogeneous- meaning that the patient population was not controlled and the type of exercise was not controlled. While the debate continues, experts agree that the prevention of claudication is perhaps the best way to manage the disease. The pharmacist and nurse are in the ideal position to educate the patient on the risks of smoking and lack of exercise. Patients with intermittent claudication must be advised to eat a healthy diet, control the blood sugars and hypertension, lower the levels of cholesterol and glucose, and participate in an exercise program. There is ample evidence showing that undertaking these measures improves the quality of life and reduces the burden of many medical disorders.
Outcomes
The latest data suggest that in patients with intermittent claudication, endovascular surgery, open surgery, and exercise therapy are superior to medical management in terms of walking distance and symptom relief. (Level V) However, there are no good long-term studies to determine which of the procedures is more effective. The data on exercise therapy alone are conflicting and only of short-term duration. What is also not known is how many additional endovascular procedures will be required in the future to keep the patient symptom free. Whether any of these treatments can improve claudication over the long term still remains to be seen.